In Union County, South Carolina, the formerly prosperous cotton mills that once employed numerous residents have vanished. Today, the county is labeled a “food desert,” indicating that a significant portion of its inhabitants reside at a distance from the closest supermarket. Addressing this challenge, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated efforts in 2016, working alongside farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the county, where roughly 30% of the citizens are Black and nearly 25% experience poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby supported the project using her own savings and modest grants. Nonetheless, in 2023, her work gained considerable momentum when the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of a major national corporation—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This financial backing was included in a larger $1.5 million program designed to assist “community-focused non-profits led by individuals of color.”
“I was moved to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates what you do.”
Only two years prior, initiatives like this received widespread support from leading corporations throughout the United States, as the nation grappled with systemic racism after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black individual who lost his life beneath the knee of a police officer in Minneapolis.
Yet, several of these companies are now withdrawing from those pledges. In November, Walmart revealed it would end certain diversity programs, including the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in providing Ms. Ashby’s grant.
Businesses like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have taken comparable actions, indicating a wider corporate retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts.
This change signifies a significant cultural transition, spurred partially by concerns over legal challenges, regulatory oversight, and social media backlash—pressures intensified by the new U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has actively sought to dismantle DEI programs, pushing for a shift back to “merit-based opportunity” in the U.S. He has directed the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and begin investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of “illegal DEI practices.”
Within the early months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs closed its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency placed nearly 200 civil rights employees on paid leave, and Trump dismissed the country’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary previously suggested he should be removed due to his association with “woke” DEI policies.
Initially, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to enhance outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. However, some experts propose that these initiatives could continue, though under different titles that resonate more closely with the evolving political landscape of a nation that has just chosen a leader determined to oppose “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Programs modeled after DEI initially gained traction in the United States during the 1960s, as a reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to enhance and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described through terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these programs sought to address the enduring impacts of slavery and the institutional discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to embrace “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In the realm of corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment practices, portraying diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents claim that these programs tackle inequities across different communities, even though the focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The push for DEI surged in 2020 amid the Black Lives Matter protests and increasing demands for social change. Walmart, for instance, pledged $100 million over five years to establish its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo appointed its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already had similar leadership roles in place. Following these changes, S&P 100 companies created over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them going to people of color, according to Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as rapidly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
In recent times, critics have amplified claims that DEI efforts—initially intended to fight discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Training workshops that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The basis of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic model proposing that racism is deeply ingrained in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in educational institutions evolved into wider attempts to target “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts such as End Wokeness and conservative personalities like Robby Starbuck have leveraged this sentiment, focusing on companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for influencing policy changes at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his online audience.
One of the most visible victories for this movement came in spring 2023, when Bud Light faced widespread backlash for partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Calls to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, resulted in a 28% decline in Bud Light sales, according to a Harvard Business Review analysis.
Another significant milestone occurred in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be considered in university admissions, effectively ending decades of affirmative action policies.
This decision raised questions about the legal foundation of corporate DEI policies. After the ruling, Meta advised employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the termination of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI programs by major corporations prompts questions about the genuineness of their pledges to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nevertheless, not all businesses are succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation pointed out that although DEI programs seem to be decreasing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies continue to incorporate DEI commitments in their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently chose to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public sentiment on DEI is polarized. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has decreased, yet support for associated matters—like equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey revealed that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI initiatives as advantageous.
